![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
WHAT TO DO IF AN NDA IS VIOLATEDWhat happens if someone who signed an NDA discloses
one of your trade secrets?
Even Without an NDA, the Law Is On Your Side Whether or not you have an NDA, you can take legal action against the theft of your trade secrets, known as misappropriation, under state laws. Misappropriation is the acquisition or disclosure of trade secrets by improper means including theft, bribery and fraud. Examples include:
Most of the laws that protect trade secrets are based upon the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA). Click here to find an explanation of these laws, as well as instructions on how you can research your state's trade secret law. Four Steps to Take If an NDA Is Violated Consider this scenario. You arrive at work and learn that the company email account has been hacked and secret files have been copied. You suspect a recently fired contractor who had signed an NDA. What do you do? If you suspect theft of trade secrets, we suggest taking the following steps. STEP 1 - Contact an Attorney Battling over trade secrets, like hang-gliding, is a high-risk activity. An experienced attorney can minimize your risks, preserve your trade secret rights and provide a realistic perspective of your chances in the dispute. (Section F discusses hiring an attorney and keeping your legal costs down.) Although your attorney will direct you in the remaining steps described in this section-acquiring evidence, determining injuries, proving trade secrecy and determining your legal claims-it's not wise or efficient to rely solely on your attorney. You must stay informed and take an active role in making litigation decisions. And to do that, become familiar with the risks and legal principles discussed on this page. Step 2 - Acquire Evidence Whenever trade secrets are lost-whether or not an NDA is violated-you will need to investigate, or hire an investigator, to learn as much as possible about the trade secrecy loss. These investigations commonly require surveillance of employees. Consult your attorney before hiring an investigator or using undercover surveillance because these actions may make you liable for claims such as invasion of privacy. Most investigations are performed surreptitiously because your employees may have ties to a former employee accused of trade secret theft and the presence of investigators may tip your hand. Investigation of the theft is crucial. If you file a lawsuit and you don't have any evidence to prove your case, you can be ordered to pay the other side's attorney fees under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) or under an attorney fee provision in an NDA. Also, if you make public statements that contain unprovable accusations of trade secret theft and you injure that person's reputation, you may be liable for defamation. Direct evidence of trade secret misappropriation is often hard to come by. If the dispute goes to trial, a court may infer misappropriation from ambiguous circumstantial evidence. For example, consider a former employee who signed an NDA and subsequently took a job with a competitor. Sufficient circumstantial evidence may be that: confidential information is missing from the former employee's office or computer; in an unusual departure of routine, the former employee worked late hours or on weekends; and the competing business has begun to use similar trade secret technology. When gathering evidence, you will need information about:
In addition, you should also gather evidence that your confidential information has economic value, is not generally known and is subject to reasonable security efforts. You'll also have to document the origins of trade secrets and furnish copies of signed NDAs to your lawyer. STEP 3 - Determine What Legal Claims To Make In order to put a halt to a disclosure-either through negotiation or litigation-your lawyer will need to show that you have solid grounds for a lawsuit against the person who violated the NDA. One legal claim you'll make is that the person has committed breach of contract. In addition, you and your attorney must determine whether you have other grounds on which to sue the perpetrators Each one you come up with may provide you with a separate remedy and separate damages. Here are some possibilities:
CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. Several states and the federal government have passed laws that make the unauthorized disclosure, theft or use of a trade secret a crime. Under these laws the government, not private businesses, arrests the perpetrators and brings criminal charges. The penalties-including imprisonment-can be much more severe than in a civil suit. A person convicted of violating the federal Electronic Espionage Act of 1996 can be imprisoned up to 10 years. The filing of a criminal case does not prevent you from suing. For example, in a case involving the Avery-Dennison company, a Taiwanese competitor was ordered to pay $5 million in fines to the government as a result of criminal charges and $60 million to Avery-Dennison as a result of a civil lawsuit involving claims of trade secret misappropriation, RICO violations and conversion. Criminal prosecutions of trade secret theft are rare because many businesses prefer not to bring law enforcement officials into the fray. Also, in some cases, law enforcement officials don't wish to prosecute because there may not be sufficient evidence to obtain conviction. Keep in mind that the standards of proof for criminal cases are higher than for civil battles. STEP 4 - Determine What You Lost and What You Want How has the trade secrecy loss affected your business? You need to know in order to figure out what you want from the perpetrators. For example, if you intended to patent an invention, disclosure of confidential information may ruin your chances. In his treatise on trade secrets, attorney James Pooley describes three stages of trade secret misappropriation: threatened, continuing and completed. The extent of your injury, and the appropriate remedy, depend upon which stage you're at. A threatened misappropriation is one in which your confidential information has not been disclosed to the public or used by a competitor-for example, if you learn that an ex-employee was photocopying your company's trade secret material and will soon be starting work with a competitor. This type of problem is sometimes resolved by a written request to the employee to return all confidential materials. If that fails, you may need to quickly go to court for an order requiring the employee to return the materials and not disclose them. In a continuing misappropriation, an injury has occurred, but trade secret rights may not have been lost-for example, a competitor is using a secret of yours but has not publicly disclosed it. In this situation, you may be able to obtain a court order halting the unauthorized use and, in some cases, to receive compensation from the competitor. In this way your business can still retain trade secret rights. A completed misappropriation is one in which your injuries are extensive and irreversible. You can't reclaim trade secret rights because the secret has been publicly disclosed or extensively used by a competitor. In other words, a court order prohibiting continuing or future uses would not provide much benefit because the cat is out of the bag. The best remedy is to file a lawsuit and demand a financial payment from the competitor: either your lost profits or the competitor's profits. Or you might allow the competitor to continue using the secret and negotiate a continuing royalty. As you can see, the extent of your injury also affects the speed with which you must take action. A threatened misappropriation requires immediate action; you must rush to obtain a court order preventing disclosure. The same immediacy is not present if the misappropriation is completed and the damage is done. As with medical injuries, your course of action in a trade secret dispute is dictated by the available cures (or "remedies"). You need to figure out your remedies before your attorney sends a letter to the other party. These potential remedies can be used as leverage to end the dispute before a lawsuit is filed. Potential remedies include: An injunction is a court order directed at those who have stolen your secrets. Asking for an injunction is common, since the primary goal of an NDA is to keep information secret. Courts are authorized to issue emergency injunctions, called temporary restraining orders (TROs) in a matter of days, when you show that a trade secret is at risk of being lost as a result of the misappropriation. The court must then schedule a hearing at which all sides may be heard. If, after this hearing, the court still believes that a trade secret is at stake and that you will probably win at trial, it can issue a "preliminary" injunction. This order will continue to prevent further use or disclosure of the trade secret pending a final decision in the case. As a practical matter, once a preliminary injunction is granted, the parties often settle, rather than fight the case through to trial and beyond. Sometimes injunctions are permanent -that is, they are final court orders in the case. More commonly, courts give the rightful owner of the trade secret a "head start" by prohibiting the information's use by the competitor for such period of time as the court decides it would have taken the competitor to independently develop the information. If a court determines that an injunction would not be appropriate-for example, the competitor has already engaged in widespread use of your secret and has ruined your competitive advantage-the court can instead order your competitor to pay you a reasonable royalty for further use of the trade secret. Injunctions and Free Speech. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from placing restrictions on a person's freedom of speech. One exception to this rule is that a court may issue an injunction against the public disclosure-usually in the form of a publication-of trade secrets that have been obtained in violation of an NDA, for example, if an employee violates an NDA and gives trade secrets to a reporter. A court would weigh several factors when deciding whether or not to forbid the reporter from publishing the secrets. The court would consider the commercial interest in the trade secrets, the reporter's right to speak freely and the illegal behavior used to acquire the trade secrets. Compensatory and punitive damages If you suffer a financial loss as a result of a breach of an NDA, you may be able to get a court to award money damages to you. Your damages are measured by either:
If the person or company you're suing acted with spite or ill will or a disregard for the probable injury (defined as "willful and malicious"), courts in many states can impose punitive damages. These are damages awarded to you for the purpose of punishing the wrongdoer and providing an example to other would-be trade secret thieves. EXAMPLE: A court awarded punitive damages when an executive who took trade secrets from his former employer also intentionally deleted the information from company computers and removed all traces of the technology from the company offices. This conduct led to a finding that the theft was willful and malicious. Bond v. Polycycle, Inc., 732 A.2d 970 (1999). In reality, courts often strike down any punitives that are too far out of sync with the actual damages. In most states that have adopted the UTSA, punitive damages are limited to twice the amount of proven actual damages. For example, if the compensatory damages were $10,000, the court could award only $20,000 in punitive damages (for a total award of $30,000). If your NDA includes an attorney fee provision, you can ask the court to direct the other party to pay your lawyer's bills if you prevail. If you settle the case, neither side has to pay the other (unless the attorney fee payment was negotiated as part of the settlement). Even if there is no attorney fee provision in an NDA, a court may require the other side to pay your attorney fees if it is engaged in "willful and malicious" misappropriation. This decision is up to the judge. What to Do If You're Accused of Violating an NDA If someone accuses you of violating an NDA, you should take a course of action similar to that described above. Review your NDA, retain an attorney, investigate the trade secret, determine the facts and review the defenses, remedies and alternatives to litigation. In addition, check your company's insurance coverage. Your comprehensive or commercial general liability (CGL) policy may pay your attorney costs for defending the suit. Coverage is often established in a provision known as "advertising injury." Some courts interpret this provision to require insurance companies to defend lawsuits in which the trade secrets relate to marketing information. Consult your attorney and notify your insurance company promptly.
|
|